Drug Cases
Results are what you expect when you hire an attorney. Results are a complete or partial victory, results are your freedom, family, money, or whatever justice dictates. We get results for our clients. Our verdicts, settlements and victories on behalf of our clients are not mere unsubstantiated words but proven facts. We get results because we work tirelessly, investigate thoroughly and research extensively. We meet with our clients endlessly until we know your case inside and out. We get results because we are experienced, we are well known in the legal community and we know how to get your case successfully resolved.
Philadelphia Drug Lawyer
Facing drug charges in Philadelphia is one of the most stressful things a person can go through. Whether you were stopped by police and found with a small amount of a controlled substance or you’re looking at a felony possession with intent to deliver charge, the consequences are serious and the process moves fast. At Pagano Law, we represent people charged with drug offenses throughout Philadelphia and the surrounding counties. We know how the local courts work, we know the prosecutors, and we know how to build a defense that gives you a real chance at a real outcome.
Drug cases are not all the same, and they should not all be handled the same way. Some cases turn entirely on whether a search was legal. Others hinge on whether the Commonwealth can actually prove possession. Some involve first-time offenders who have an opportunity to avoid a conviction altogether through a diversion program. The point is that there is almost always something to work with — but only if you have an attorney who knows where to look and how to fight.
What Philadelphia Drug Charges Actually Look Like
Pennsylvania’s drug laws cover a wide range of conduct, from simple possession of a small amount of marijuana to large-scale distribution of controlled substances. The charge you face depends on the type of drug, the quantity, how the drugs were packaged, and what the police claim to have observed. Understanding the charge is the first step toward understanding your options.
Possession with Intent to Deliver (PWID)
Possession with Intent to Deliver is a felony charge that can be brought against someone who possessed drugs and allegedly intended to sell or distribute them. Prosecutors don’t need to catch you in the middle of an actual transaction. They can build a PWID case around the quantity of drugs, the presence of scales or packaging materials, or the testimony of a narcotics officer who claims to have observed suspicious activity.
A conviction for PWID carries significant prison time and long-term consequences that follow you for years — in employment, housing, and professional licensing. This is not a charge to approach without experienced legal counsel.
Knowing and Intentional Possession (Simple Possession)
Simple possession, often referred to as “K&I” in Pennsylvania courts, is a misdemeanor charge that applies when someone is found with a controlled substance for personal use. While it is less serious than PWID, a conviction still results in a criminal record and can trigger a mandatory driver’s license suspension, immigration consequences, and the loss of eligibility for certain jobs or financial aid.
Criminal Use of a Communications Facility (CUCF)
If police allege that a cell phone was used in connection with a drug transaction, they can tack on a CUCF charge. This is a third-degree felony, which means it can carry more prison time than the underlying drug offense itself. It is a charge that gets overlooked by some defendants and their families but deserves serious attention.
Possession of a Small Amount of Marijuana
Pennsylvania law includes a specific statute for possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana with no evidence of intent to sell. While Philadelphia has civil citation policies for low-level marijuana offenses, state law still allows for criminal arrests, and the odor of marijuana can still give police a basis to conduct a more thorough search. Even a conviction under the small amount statute comes with collateral consequences that are worth understanding before accepting any plea.
How Pennsylvania Classifies Controlled Substances
The severity of a drug charge in Pennsylvania is tied closely to how the substance is classified under state law. The Pennsylvania Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act follows a scheduling system similar to federal law:
Schedule I drugs are considered to have no accepted medical use and high abuse potential. This category includes heroin, LSD, and MDMA (ecstasy).
Schedule II drugs have a high potential for abuse but some accepted medical applications, such as oxycodone, fentanyl, and methadone.
Schedule III and IV drugs include substances like ketamine, anabolic steroids, benzodiazepines like Xanax and Valium, and certain prescription medications with lower abuse potential.
Schedule V substances are considered the least dangerous under the scheduling framework and include some low-level codeine-containing preparations.
The schedule of the drug affects both the classification of the charge and the potential penalties at sentencing. Our Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers analyze the specific substance involved in your case as part of evaluating every available defense.
Drug Charge Defenses That Actually Work
There is a persistent misconception that if police found drugs on or near you, there is nothing to fight. That is simply not true. Some of the strongest drug defenses have nothing to do with whether drugs were actually present — they focus on whether the evidence was legally obtained and whether it can actually be used against you.
Challenging the Search
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. If police stopped you without legal justification, searched your car without consent or probable cause, or executed a warrant that was defective on its face, the evidence they recovered may be suppressible. A successful motion to suppress can result in the charges being withdrawn entirely because without the physical evidence, the Commonwealth often has no case.
Attorney Gregory J. Pagano has handled these motions in both the Philadelphia Municipal Court and the Court of Common Pleas. The analysis is fact-specific and requires a thorough investigation of the stop, the search, and the officers involved. If there is a constitutional violation in your case, we will find it.
Attacking the Commonwealth’s Evidence at the Preliminary Hearing
In felony drug cases, the Commonwealth must establish a prima facie case at a preliminary hearing. This means they have to show it is more likely than not that a crime occurred and that you committed it. Experienced cross-examination of police witnesses at this stage can sometimes result in charges being dismissed before the case ever reaches trial. We discuss what the preliminary hearing process looks like in detail on our blog post on what happens after a preliminary hearing in Philadelphia.
Confidential Informant Motions
Philadelphia narcotics investigations frequently rely on confidential informants. If the police used a CI to build the case against you, there may be grounds to file a motion seeking disclosure of the informant’s identity. In cases where the informant is the only eyewitness to alleged transactions that took place inside a building or out of police view, the Commonwealth may have to choose between revealing the informant or withdrawing the charges.
Diversion Programs
Not every drug case has to end with a conviction. Pennsylvania offers several programs — including ARD (Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition) and drug court — that allow eligible defendants to avoid a permanent criminal record by completing certain requirements. Whether you qualify depends on your prior record, the nature of the charge, and prosecutorial discretion. We help clients evaluate diversion options honestly and realistically.
Trial Defense
If the case proceeds to trial, we are ready. Defenses at trial can include challenging the credibility of narcotics officers, presenting expert testimony on whether possession was truly with intent to deliver, locating surveillance footage, or demonstrating that the drugs belonged to someone else who was present. Drug cases are often more complex than they appear on paper, and a prepared, aggressive trial attorney can make a significant difference.
What Drug Convictions Cost You
People sometimes focus exclusively on the possibility of jail time when evaluating a drug charge, but the collateral consequences of a conviction are just as significant and often more lasting. A drug conviction in Pennsylvania can result in:
A mandatory driver’s license suspension, even for a first-offense simple possession charge involving marijuana. This applies automatically under Pennsylvania law and is separate from any sentence the court imposes.
Loss of professional licenses or disqualification from obtaining one in fields like nursing, law, and real estate.
Consequences for public housing eligibility and federal student financial aid.
Serious immigration consequences for non-citizens, potentially including deportation or bars to naturalization.
Permanent damage to a criminal record that shows up on background checks for employers, landlords, and licensing boards.
Understanding the full picture is part of what we do during every client consultation. If you want to understand what you are facing and what can realistically be done about it, read our overview of what to do after being arrested in Philadelphia to get grounded before your first call with us.
Why Drug Cases Are Among the Hardest to Defend — and How We Approach Them
Drug charges present specific challenges that make experienced representation essential. Prosecutors in Philadelphia have substantial experience with these cases, narcotics officers testify regularly and know how to present their observations convincingly, and the evidentiary record often appears overwhelming at first glance. Our perspective on which criminal cases are hardest to defend outlines why skilled preparation matters more than some defendants initially realize.
What separates an effective drug defense from a passive one is investigation. We do not take police reports at face value. We examine the probable cause affidavit supporting any search warrant, we review body camera footage when available, we investigate the history of any confidential informant involved, and we look carefully at the chain of custody for physical evidence. We also know how to communicate with our clients throughout the process — explaining what is happening, what options exist, and what our honest assessment of each outcome looks like.
Pagano Law has handled media-attention cases involving serious criminal charges in Philadelphia. You can read more about our approach to high-stakes criminal defense on our Philadelphia media criminal defense page.
Pennsylvania Drug Sentencing Guidelines
Sentencing for a drug conviction in Pennsylvania depends on several factors, including the schedule and quantity of the substance, whether the charge is possession or possession with intent to deliver, and the defendant’s prior record score under the Pennsylvania Sentencing Guidelines. First-time offenders often have more options available to them, but prior convictions — even for unrelated offenses — can significantly affect the sentencing range a judge considers.
The Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing publishes guidelines that judges use as a framework, but these are not mandatory minimums in most state drug cases. An experienced attorney can argue for a sentence below the guideline range when the circumstances justify it, and can present mitigating evidence that influences the outcome at sentencing even after a conviction.
We Serve Clients in Philadelphia and Nearby Counties
Our practice covers Philadelphia and extends into the surrounding region. If you are facing drug charges in Bucks County, our Bucks County criminal defense attorney page has additional information specific to how those cases are handled outside the city.
Contact a Philadelphia Drug Lawyer at Pagano Law
Drug charges move quickly through the Philadelphia court system. The decisions made in the first days and weeks after an arrest — what you say, what you do not say, who you contact — can shape the entire case. The sooner you have an attorney involved, the more options you typically have.
Pagano Law represents clients charged with drug offenses throughout Philadelphia, including possession with intent to deliver, simple possession, CUCF charges, and related offenses. Attorney Gregory J. Pagano brings years of experience in Philadelphia’s criminal courts and a commitment to honest, aggressive representation.
Call our office today to schedule a consultation. We will review your situation, explain what the charges mean, and give you a clear picture of what we can do to help.
Philadelphia Drug Defense Lawyer FAQs
Can I be charged with PWID even if I wasn't selling?
Yes. Pennsylvania prosecutors do not need direct evidence of a sale to charge you with Possession with Intent to Deliver. They can argue intent based on circumstantial evidence — the quantity of drugs, how they were packaged, the presence of scales or baggies, or the amount of cash found nearby. This is one of the most common and frustrating aspects of PWID cases. The charge can feel unfair when you know the drugs were for personal use, but the Commonwealth’s standard for bringing the charge is lower than most people expect. That is why it matters to have a lawyer who can challenge the inference of intent before it hardens into a conviction.
What happens if the drugs were in my car but weren't mine?
This comes up more often than people realize. If drugs are found in a shared vehicle or a car that multiple people had access to, the Commonwealth still has to prove that you had actual or constructive possession of them. Constructive possession means you knew the drugs were there and had the ability to exercise control over them. If there is a genuine question about who the drugs belonged to, that is a defense worth building. Proximity to drugs alone is not proof of possession, and we can challenge the Commonwealth’s evidence on exactly that point.
Will a drug conviction show up on a background check forever?
In most cases, yes — unless the conviction is expunged or you obtain relief under Pennsylvania’s Clean Slate law. Pennsylvania’s automated sealing process can make certain misdemeanor convictions invisible to most background check requestors after a ten-year period without additional offenses, but felony drug convictions are not automatically sealed. Expungement of a conviction is generally limited to cases that resulted in acquittals, dismissals, or certain ARD completions. This is one of the reasons it is so important to fight the charge aggressively upfront rather than assume a guilty plea is just an easy way to move on.
What is ARD and do I qualify?
ARD stands for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition. It is a pre-trial diversion program in Pennsylvania that allows first-time, non-violent offenders to avoid a conviction by completing probation, community service, drug treatment, and other requirements set by the court. Successful completion results in the charges being dismissed and the arrest record being eligible for expungement. Not everyone qualifies — the District Attorney’s office has discretion over who is admitted — and the nature of the charge matters. ARD is generally not available for more serious felony drug offenses, but for eligible defendants it can be a genuinely life-changing option.
Should I talk to the police after a drug arrest?
No. You have the right to remain silent, and you should use it. Police officers are trained to ask questions in ways that seem conversational but are designed to build evidence against you. Anything you say can and will be used in court. Politely tell the officers that you are invoking your right to remain silent and that you want to speak with an attorney. Then stop talking. This applies whether you believe you have done nothing wrong and whether the officer seems friendly or adversarial. The time to explain yourself is with your lawyer present, not in the back of a police car.
Can a drug charge be reduced to a lesser offense?
Sometimes. Plea negotiations in drug cases can result in reduced charges, particularly when the evidence has weaknesses or when a defendant has a clean prior record and is willing to complete drug treatment or other programming. A felony PWID charge can, in some circumstances, be resolved as a misdemeanor simple possession if the facts and the defendant’s history support it. Whether that outcome is in your best interest depends on the full picture of your case. We evaluate every available option — including whether to fight the charge outright — before recommending any resolution.
What if the police had a warrant — can I still challenge the search?
Yes. A search warrant is not an automatic guarantee that the search was constitutional. Warrants can be challenged on several grounds: the affidavit of probable cause may have contained false or misleading information, the warrant may have been broader than what the law allowed, or the search may have gone beyond the scope of what the warrant authorized. These are technical but consequential arguments. A warrant that appears valid on its face may still be defective in ways that are worth pursuing, and we examine the warrant and supporting documents carefully in every case where one was obtained.
Testimonials
What Clients Say
“Thank you for bringing my son home Mr. Pagano.”
D. Pennington – 10/19 Not Guilty – Attempted Murder D. Pennington - 10/19 Not Guilty - Attempted Murder
“We hired Greg to handle a very scary and urgent situation that involved one of our children. Greg engaged immediately. We felt like we knew him and could trust him very quickly . . . he was “all in” totally vested in the outcome. Greg is passionate, smart and responsive.”
Anonymous – 5/17 Case Dismissed – Robbery Motor Vehicle (Carjacking) Anonymous - 5/17 Case Dismissed - Robbery Motor Vehicle (Carjacking)
“Mr. Pagano won my double murder case and then got me $750,000.00.”
Nafis Pinkney – 2/18 Not Guilty – Murder Case. Nafis Pinkney - 2/18 Not Guilty - Murder Case.
“Greg insisted on hiring a ballistician, and the results were in my favor, but the prosecution still persisted . . . was relentless in pursuing the true story of the incident . . . Greg was fantastic and never wavered in pursuit of a fair outcome for me. I am very grateful to him and his fine staf...
John P. – 3/18 Case Dismissed – Discharge of Firearm at Police. John P. - 3/18 Case Dismissed - Discharge of Firearm at Police.
“Greg is very good at what he does which is practicing law. His team is very professional and caring for ensuring and working on your cases and being very communicating with you through all the process.”
Mike – 5/18 Mike - 5/18
“Thankfully I was found not guilty, but it wouldn’t have been so without the excellent litigation skills of Mr. Pagano.”
Mike – 8/18 Not Guilty – Assault and Burglary Mike - 8/18 Not Guilty - Assault and Burglary
“I had a very difficult case which I thought was difficult to win. I was found not guilty.”
Anonymous – 11/18 Anonymous - 11/18
“He and his staff worked very hard for our family. He is an excellent attorney.”
YE – 11/18 NOT GUILTY – Murder Case YE - 11/18 NOT GUILTY - Murder Case
“Mr. Pagano (Greg), is an OUTSTANDING, UPSTANDING and DETERMINED attorney.”
Lisa M. – 12/18 Case Dismissed – Drugs and Guns Lisa M. - 12/18 Case Dismissed - Drugs and Guns
“Greg, and his assistant Sarah provided my son with excellent legal representation. You can use any lawyer but its clear Greg is head and shoulders above his peers. His reputation in the courthouse and his professionalism carries a lot of weight in his dealings with the DA’S. He used his skill t...
AT – 12/18 Case Dismissed. Aggravated Assault on Police. AT - 12/18 Case Dismissed. Aggravated Assault on Police.
Mr. Pagano provided amazing service to me. He provided a holistic approach because he understood that my children were affected by the unfortunate circumstances. Throughout the process, he was attentive to all of my concerns as a client.
I should have left this review a long while ago. I was fighting a serious case in 2012. Its effects turned my life upside down. Mr. Pagano saved my life. The opportunities I have today would not be possible if not for him and his entire team.
Sarah jones helped me with my child support case. They kept running over me not listening to anything I said, taking more money from me until I hired Sarah. I told her my story and she took it from there and when it was time to go e I won all my cases. Just wanted to say Sarah Jones is no joke, she does a great job and I want to say thank u again Sarah.
Cases Featured In:
Talk To A Lawyer
Enter Your Contact Details Below
- Our firm provides the highest quality legal services - criminal, civil or family law - to individuals in Philadelphia, anywhere in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and any state in the country. Whether we are fighting for your liberty, your health, your family, your rights or your money, we fight to win.