Philadelphia Arson & Property Crimes Lawyer
Available Now
(215) 636-0160
24/7 for urgent matters
Philadelphia & Media, PA
Direct attorney access
Philadelphia Voluntary Manslaughter Lawyer
Arson is one of the most aggressively prosecuted felony offenses in Pennsylvania. When a fire occurs under suspicious circumstances, law enforcement moves fast. The Philadelphia Fire Marshal’s Office, the Philadelphia Police Department Arson Unit, and private insurance investigators often launch parallel investigations before a single charge has been filed. By the time most people think about calling a lawyer, prosecutors may already be building a case against them.
Aggressive defense when everything is on the line in an arson & property crime case.
Arson Charges Under Pennsylvania Law
Pennsylvania defines arson and related offenses under 18 Pa. C.S. § 3301. The statute covers a range of conduct, from intentionally setting fires to destroy another person’s property to accidental fires that get out of control and endanger others. The grade of the offense depends on what happened, who was at risk, and what the prosecution believes your intent was. Let’s check out the main categories of arson that could apply in Philadelphia.
Arson Endangering Persons (First-Degree Felony)
Intentionally starting a fire or explosion that recklessly places another person in danger of bodily injury or death, including firefighters and first responders. This charge also applies when a fire is set with the purpose of destroying an inhabited building, even if no one is harmed.
Aggravated Arson (First-Degree Felony)
Charged when the defendant intentionally causes or attempts to cause bodily injury to another person, or when someone is present inside the structure at the time of the fire.
Arson Endangering Property (Second-Degree Felony
Applies when a fire is set with the intent to destroy an unoccupied structure, damage another person’s property, or collect insurance proceeds on the loss.
Arson of a Historic Resource (Second-Degree Felony)
A separate offense for fires set on properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the Pennsylvania Register of Historic Places, or structures that have been in existence for more than 100 years.
Reckless Burning or Exploding (Third-Degree Felony)
Covers situations where someone recklessly starts a fire that endangers an uninhabited structure belonging to another, or personal property with a value exceeding $5,000.
Dangerous Burning (Summary Offense)
The lowest-level offense under the statute, applying when someone intentionally or recklessly starts a fire that endangers any person or property, even if no actual damage results.
If a fire results in the death of another person, Pennsylvania law allows prosecutors to charge the defendant with second-degree murder, which carries a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. If the fire was set with the intent to cause death, the charge becomes first-degree murder.
Related Property Crimes We Defend
Arson rarely stands alone. Prosecutors frequently stack related charges, and some property crime cases begin without arson charges at all. The Pagano Law team also defends clients facing:
Criminal Mischief (18 Pa. C.S. § 3304)
Intentional damage to another person’s property. Grading ranges from a summary offense to a third-degree felony depending on the dollar value of the damage. This charge frequently appears alongside arson allegations or in cases involving vandalism of commercial or residential property.
Causing or Risking a Catastrophe (18 Pa. C.S. § 3302)
A broader charge than arson that applies when someone’s conduct creates a widespread danger of damage or injury through fire, explosion, flood, or structural collapse. This offense can be charged even when the defendant did not start a fire themselves.
Possession of Incendiary Materials (18 Pa. C.S. § 3301(f))
A standalone third-degree felony for possessing, manufacturing, or transporting explosive or incendiary devices or materials with the intent to commit an offense. Prosecutors often charge this alongside arson to add leverage at sentencing.
Insurance Fraud
When a property owner is accused of setting a fire to collect on an insurance policy, prosecutors frequently bring fraud charges in addition to arson. In some cases, these charges are pursued at the federal level, which carries its own separate set of consequences. If you are facing charges that cross into federal territory, it is worth reviewing how federal criminal cases differ from state prosecutions before assuming your situation is straightforward.
Penalties for Arson and Property Crimes in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania treats arson as one of its most serious felony offenses, and the potential penalties reflect that. A first-degree felony arson conviction can result in a state prison sentence of up to 20 years, and up to 40 years if a firefighter, police officer, or civilian suffers bodily injury in the fire. A second-degree felony carries up to 10 years in prison and a maximum fine of $25,000. Third-degree felony reckless burning carries a maximum of 7 years.
But the consequences of an arson conviction extend well beyond the prison sentence. A felony record in Pennsylvania can make it extremely difficult to secure housing, obtain certain professional licenses, and maintain employment. Insurance companies track arson convictions closely, and a conviction can affect your ability to obtain homeowner’s or renter’s insurance for years. These collateral consequences are rarely discussed in court, but they are very real, and they are part of why fighting these charges aggressively from the start is crucial.
How Philadelphia Arson Investigations Work
One of the most important things to understand about arson cases is that the investigation often begins before anyone is charged or arrested. The Philadelphia Fire Marshal’s Office conducts origin-and-cause investigations after any fire that raises questions about how it started. Fire investigators are trained to examine burn patterns, char depth, smoke residue, and potential accelerant use to determine whether a fire was accidental or intentionally set.
At the same time, the Philadelphia Police Department’s Arson Unit may open a parallel criminal investigation. And if you have an insurance policy on the property, your insurance company’s own investigators will likely be conducting a separate inquiry into whether to pay the claim. All three of these investigations can produce evidence that ends up in a criminal prosecution.
This is why early legal intervention is so critical. Under Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 540, you have the right to counsel before making any statement to investigators. If you speak with the fire marshal, police, or an insurance investigator without an attorney present, those statements can be used against you. An attorney from Pagano Law can intervene before charges are filed, advise you on what not to say, and begin gathering evidence on your behalf before the prosecution has a chance to build an unchallenged narrative.
Gregory J. Pagano, has spent decades handling serious criminal matters in Philadelphia and the surrounding region. He understands the local prosecutorial landscape and what it takes to mount an effective pre-trial defense in arson cases.
Defense Strategies for Arson and Property Crime Charges
Arson prosecutions are built on a combination of expert opinion and circumstantial evidence, and both of those can be challenged effectively. There is no single defense that applies to every case, but the following strategies are among the most important in arson and property crime litigation.
Challenging the Origin-and-Cause Investigation
Fire investigation is not a perfect science. The methods fire marshals use to determine whether a fire was accidental or intentional have been criticized in peer-reviewed research, and courts have increasingly allowed defense experts to challenge government investigators’ findings. A qualified defense expert can examine the same physical evidence and offer a different interpretation of burn patterns, point of origin, and whether accelerants were actually present or simply the result of materials that burn in ways that mimic accelerant use.
Contesting Intent
Arson requires intentional or reckless conduct. Accidental fires are not crimes. If the evidence shows that a fire started due to an electrical fault, a heating malfunction, or some other accidental cause, the prosecution cannot meet its burden of proof. This is a common defense in cases where investigators assume arson but have not ruled out alternative causes.
Suppression of Evidence
Fire scenes are sometimes entered and searched in ways that raise Fourth Amendment concerns. If investigators conducted an unlawful search of a property, obtained statements without advising you of your Miranda rights, or seized evidence improperly, a motion to suppress that evidence may significantly weaken the prosecution’s case. This is one reason it is critical to know what to do in the first 24 hours after an arrest in Philadelphia and to invoke your rights early.
Attacking Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Claims
In cases where prosecutors allege an insurance fraud motive, they are often working from assumptions rather than proof. Financial stress does not equal motive to commit arson, and the presence of an insurance policy does not mean a fire was set to collect on it. These allegations can and should be challenged with financial records, testimony, and other evidence that paints a more complete picture.
Eyewitness and Identification Challenges
In arson cases with eyewitnesses, cross-examination of those witnesses can be critical. Visibility conditions at a fire scene, distance, stress, and other factors can affect the reliability of witness identification. Defense counsel can challenge these accounts through cross-examination and, where appropriate, expert testimony on the limits of eyewitness memory.
What Happens After Charges Are Filed
Once arson charges are formally filed in Philadelphia, the case moves through the court system in a series of stages. A preliminary hearing is typically scheduled within 14 days of arrest for defendants who are held in custody. At this stage, the prosecution must show that there is sufficient evidence to send the case to trial. Understanding what happens after a preliminary hearing in Philadelphia is essential for anyone navigating the process for the first time.
If the case proceeds, the defense will have the opportunity to review all evidence and witness statements through discovery, file pre-trial motions to suppress evidence or dismiss charges, and prepare for trial. Arson cases frequently turn on the quality of the defense’s expert witnesses, the strength of suppression arguments, and counsel’s ability to cross-examine fire investigators effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions About Arson Charges in Philadelphia
Can I be charged with arson if the fire was on my own property?
Yes. Pennsylvania law applies the arson statute to fires set on the defendant’s own property when the fire recklessly endangered another person, was set with intent to destroy another’s inhabited building, or was started to collect insurance proceeds on the loss.
What is the difference between arson and reckless burning?
Arson requires intentional conduct directed at a specific outcome, such as destroying a building or endangering another person. Reckless burning is charged when someone recklessly starts a fire that endangers an uninhabited structure or personal property valued over $5,000. It is a third-degree felony rather than a first or second-degree felony, but it still carries serious consequences.
Should I speak with the fire marshal or the insurance company before contacting a lawyer?
No. You have the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present before making any statement to investigators, including private insurance company investigators. Statements made during these early interviews are frequently used by prosecutors to establish your knowledge of the fire, your presence at the scene, and your financial circumstances. Do not speak with anyone involved in the investigation before consulting with a criminal defense attorney.
Does Pagano Law handle arson cases outside Philadelphia?
Yes. Pagano Law represents clients in Philadelphia and throughout the surrounding region, including Bucks County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, and other nearby jurisdictions.
Contact a Philadelphia Arson Defense Lawyer at Pagano Law
Arson charges carry consequences that can follow you for the rest of your life. The investigation window is short, and the sooner an attorney is involved, the more options you have. Whether you are still under investigation or have already been charged, Pagano Law is ready to review your case and advise you on your next steps.
Attorney Gregory J. Pagano has been a trusted presence in Philadelphia’s criminal defense community for decades. His work has been recognized in local and national media as a prominent Philadelphia criminal defense attorney, and his firm brings that same level of commitment to every client it represents.
Contact Pagano Law today to schedule a free, confidential consultation. We represent clients facing arson, criminal mischief, and all related property crime charges throughout Philadelphia and the surrounding counties.
What We Handle
Key areas we fight for you
Track Record
Legal Case Results
Client Stories
What clients say about us
Questions about Philadelphia Arson & Property Crimes Lawyer
Our attorneys field these questions daily. Here are the most common ones — but every situation is unique. Call us for a direct answer about your case.
Speak with an AttorneyWhat is voluntary manslaughter in Pennsylvania?
It is the intentional killing of another person committed in the heat of passion due to adequate provocation, without malice aforethought required for murder.
What is the penalty for voluntary manslaughter?
It is a first-degree felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison, along with long-term consequences like a permanent criminal record and loss of civil rights.
Can voluntary manslaughter charges be reduced or dismissed?
Yes, depending on the facts, charges may be reduced or dismissed if self-defense, lack of intent, or insufficient provocation can be proven.

